Look at the audacity with which Mr. Pratap Bhanu Mehta writes in his column, “The purpose is not to craft a connection with Shiva or Krishna, the purpose is to permanently indict minorities. It is to use a sacred place of worship as a weaponised tool against another community.” Did he and his other ‘secular’ friends ever say similar words for those who actually did this in the name of Islam? They never asked them to even be apologetic and instead helped them in glorifying their acts. Ironically, they want victims to be demonised. Just notice the way Brahmins of the time, when they were actually being especially targeted for persecution by Islamic invaders including Mughals, have been demonized in the article. He states that Pandit Jagannath was outcasted for marrying a muslim girl! The fact that Pandit Jagannath served in the courts of barbaric Mughal invaders has been wiped out to suit his narrative. Mr Pratap Bhanu refrained from demonizing Aurangzeb, but did not lose the opportunity to demonize those who were actually trying to preserve and protect themselves in the barbaric Mughal/Islamic regime known for carrying out massacre of Brahmins and destruction of temples! It is really strange that for ‘Seculars’, instead of Mughals, Brahmins were the criminal culprits even when they were being killed and persecuted!